Talk:Vote for Change

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Concerts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Concerts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of concerts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConcertsWikipedia:WikiProject ConcertsTemplate:WikiProject Concertsconcert articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Something

I seem to recall Young and Frampton appearing at more concerts than the Pearl Jam show.

Pearl Jam warmed up for this tour by playing 2 shows at the FleetCenter in Boston (now TD Banknorth Garden) on the 28th and 29th of September, with the same openers from the VFC tour. Should those shows be included? - (J0nas3 05:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VoteForChange.jpg

Image:VoteForChange.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biased and inaccurate statement??

The statement that the tour "failed in its ultimate purpose of swaying the vote in battleground states" is inaccurate for two reasons:

1. Five of the ten battleground states that had shows (if one excludes states and districts that were not battlegrounds: Arizona, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia) went for Kerry (Washington, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin).

2. The concert series was a fundraiser and did not directly attempt to sway votes in the battlegrounds states. It would be impossible, for instance, to credit the tour for "swaying the vote" in any of the states that went in Kerry's column, nor would it possible to lay blame to the tour for costing votes in the battleground states that went in Bush's column (Ohio, Missouri, Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthiness (talk • contribs) 03:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vote for Change. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.livedaily.com/news/7139.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

plenty of problems here

I'll set aside that half the claims made here are unsupported. At the moment, I've flagged

The tour was generally successful in attracting audiences, generating media attention and raising approximately $10 million for America Coming Together.

because the cited Rolling Stone article was published 11 Aug 2004, which seems… unlikely to have accurately predicted the profits from a series of shows that BEGAN six weeks later.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 06:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't see anything particularly wrong about listing the venues, it's not made clear where the ticket and revenue data comes from. As such, I've flagged the entire section.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 06:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vote for Change. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]